Drawbacks of Digital Dentistry: When Technology Doesn’t Do the Trick

February 21, 2025 Kelley Brummett DMD

By Kelley Brummett, DMD 

As digital dentistry continues to revolutionize the way we practice dentistry, the functional capacity of the new tools, ease of use, and efficiency make them indispensable for modern practice workflows. However, even the most advanced technologies sometimes fall short of delivering the precision required for certain clinical scenarios. This is particularly true for digital impressions, which, while reliable in most cases, may occasionally fail to capture all small details. When this happens, it’s essential to know when and how to turn to analog impressions for a more comprehensive approach.

Balancing Digital Dentistry with Clinical Judgement

In my practice, I rely heavily on digital dentistry tools such as the iTero scanner for restorative work, particularly crown preparations. These tools are incredibly efficient and deliver exceptional results in the majority of cases. However, there are occasions when the clinical situation—such as the condition of the tooth or the margins of the preparation—requires a different approach for successful dental restorations.

For example, a recent case involved a patient with a previous crown on a root canal-treated tooth. After removing the old crown, prepping the tooth, and performing a new buildup, I encountered challenges with the scanner capturing clear margins due to the tooth’s compromised structure. In such instances, relying solely on digital impressions could lead to inaccuracies that may impact the final dental restoration.

The Role of Analog Impressions

When digital dentistry falls short, analog impressions using high-quality materials like DMG’s Honigum Pro can provide the additional detail needed. In this case, I used Honigum Pro light body and heavy body materials, ensuring the analog impression captured the exact margins and provided a clear reference for the lab. Additionally, I combined the digital scan with the analog impression, allowing the lab to compare both and determine the most accurate path forward.

This dual approach offers several advantages:

  • Enhanced Margin Clarity: Analog impressions, when injected under pressure, can push the tissue back and flow seamlessly around the margins, capturing intricate details that may be missed digitally.
  • Increased Flexibility for the Lab: Providing both digital and physical impressions gives the lab a complete picture, reducing the likelihood of remakes and patient callbacks.

Communicating with Patients

When I need to take additional steps like combining digital dentistry with analog impressions, I communicate the reasons to patients. For example, I explain that the goal is to ensure the dental restoration fits perfectly the first time, avoiding the inconvenience of multiple visits. Patients appreciate understanding why a seemingly redundant step is actually a proactive measure to save them time and discomfort in the long run.

Embracing the Best of Both Worlds

While I am a firm advocate for digital dentistry, I’m grateful for the analog impressions that complement and enhance our digital workflows. Having the ability to compare digital and analog impressions ensures that we provide the highest standard of care for every patient, regardless of the situation. By embracing both approaches, we can achieve greater precision, efficiency, and patient satisfaction.

Digital dentistry tools are transformative, but knowing when to pause, assess, and integrate analog techniques ensures that we’re delivering the best possible outcomes. After all, it’s not about choosing between digital and analog—it’s about using the right tool for the right situation.

I hope these insights help you navigate those rare but critical moments when digital impressions alone aren’t enough. By balancing the best of both worlds, we can continue to elevate the quality of care we provide.

If you want to learn more about overcoming digital dentistry challenges, you  register for Functional Esthetic Excellence here at Pankey. Embrace a 100% digital workflow while knowing when to apply analog methods when necessary. Discover a new world of possibilities in your practice combining both analog and digital workflows!

Related Course

E4: Posterior Reconstruction and Completing the Comprehensive Treatment Sequence

DATE: December 2 2027 @ 8:00 am - December 6 2027 @ 2:30 pm

Location: The Pankey Institute

CE HOURS: 44

Regular Tuition: $ 7700

Single Occupancy with Ensuite Private Bath (per night): $ 365

The purpose of this course is to help you develop mastery with complex cases involving advanced restorative procedures, precise sequencing and interdisciplinary coordination. Building on the learning in Essentials Three…

Learn More>

About Author

User Image
Kelley Brummett DMD

Dr. Kelley D. Brummett was born and raised in Missouri. She attended the University of Kansas on a full-ride scholarship in springboard diving and received honors for being the Big Eight Diving Champion on the 1 meter springboard in 1988 and in 1992. Dr. Kelley received her BA in communication at the University of Kansas and went on to receive her Bachelor of Science in Nursing. After practicing nursing, Dr Kelley Brummett went on to earn a degree in Dentistry at the Medical College of Georgia. She has continued her education at the Pankey Institute to further her love of learning and her pursuit to provide quality individual care. Dr. Brummett is a Clinical Instructor at Georgia Regents University and is a member of the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry. Dr. Brummett and her husband Darin have two children, Sarah and Sam. They have made Newnan their home for the past 9 years. In her free time, she enjoys traveling, reading and playing with her dogs. Dr. Brummett is an active member of the ADA, GDA, AGDA, and an alumni of the Pankey Institute.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FIND A PANKEY DENTIST OR TECHNICIAN

I AM A
I AM INTERESTED IN

VIEW COURSE CALENDAR